For organizations using Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations (D365 F&O), this debate is especially relevant. These platforms give finance teams powerful tools to plan, analyze, and adapt—but the planning approach you choose determines how effectively you use them.

Let’s break it down simply and practically.

Annual Budgets: The Traditional Anchor

Annual budgets have been the backbone of financial planning for decades. They set expectations for revenue, expenses, and investments for the entire year. Most companies still rely on them because:

  • They provide a clear financial roadmap.
  • They help align departments around yearly goals.
  • They support long‑term planning and capital allocation.
  • They are required for board reporting and compliance.

In D365 Finance & Operations, annual budgets are easy to build using features like budget planning, workflows, version control, and Excel/M365 integration. Finance teams can collaborate through Excel Online, store documents in SharePoint, and manage approvals through Power Automate.

But here’s the challenge:
Annual budgets assume the world will stay stable for 12 months—and that’s rarely true anymore.

Rolling Forecasts: The Agile Alternative

Rolling forecasts update financial projections continuously—monthly or quarterly—based on real performance and market conditions. Instead of planning once a year, you plan 12–18 months at all times.

Why rolling forecasts are gaining momentum:

  • They respond quickly to market changes
  • They improve accuracy by using real‑time data
  • They help leadership make faster decisions
  • They reduce the “budget panic” at year‑end
  • They support scenario planning and risk management

With D365 F&O, rolling forecasts become even more powerful. Real‑time data flows from sales, supply chain, procurement, and operations directly into your forecasting models. Combined with Power BI, teams can visualize trends instantly and adjust assumptions without waiting for the next annual cycle.

Which One Is Winning Today?

The truth is: rolling forecasts are becoming the preferred approach for modern, data‑driven organizations, especially those already using Microsoft’s cloud ecosystem.

But that doesn’t mean annual budgets are disappearing. Instead, companies are blending both:

  • Annual budgets for long‑term direction
  • Rolling forecasts for agility and real‑time decision‑making

This hybrid model gives leadership the stability they need while empowering finance teams to adapt quickly.

How M365 & D365 F&O Make Rolling Forecasts Easier

Microsoft’s ecosystem is designed for continuous planning. Here’s how:

  1. Real‑Time Data from D365 F&O

Sales orders, inventory levels, production costs, and vendor performance update instantly—no manual consolidation.

  1. Power BI for Dynamic Forecasting

Finance teams can build interactive dashboards that refresh automatically, helping them spot trends early.

  1. Excel + OneDrive for Collaborative Planning

Teams can work on forecast templates simultaneously, with version control and audit trails.

  1. Power Automate for Approvals

Forecast submissions, reviews, and approvals can be automated, reducing delays and errors.

  1. Copilot & AI Insights

AI-driven suggestions help identify anomalies, predict cash flow, and highlight risks before they escalate.

So, What Should Your Finance Team Do Next?

If your organization still relies only on annual budgets, it may be time to evolve. Start small:

  • Introduce quarterly rolling forecasts
  • Use Power BI to visualize trends
  • Automate data refreshes from D365 F&O
  • Build simple scenarios (best-case, worst-case, and expected-case).  

Over time, your team will gain confidence—and leadership will appreciate the improved accuracy and agility.

Conclusion:-

Annual budgets give structure, but rolling forecasts give flexibility. In a world where change is constant, the winning strategy is clear: combine both. With the power of Microsoft 365 and Dynamics 365 Finance & Operations, finance teams can move from reactive planning to proactive decision‑making.